Scope
Decide which teams, tools, repositories, questions, success criteria, and reporting boundaries to include.
Most organizations begin with a focused sprint to establish a measured view of current AI engineering practice before expanding rollout. The sprint turns AI adoption questions into evidence about workflows, tools and models, code impact, team practice, and governance boundaries.
Most organizations begin with a focused Baseline Sprint. The result is a shared evidence base and a prioritized path for improving engineering impact.
Decide which teams, tools, repositories, questions, success criteria, and reporting boundaries to include.
Guide selected teams through IDE extension setup, workspace access, and expectations for responsible measurement.
Capture AI usage, workflow patterns, code impact, and review signals.
Review where AI creates value, rework, or risk.
Prioritize what to coach, standardize, govern, or roll out next.
You can begin before every answer is settled. These inputs help map DiffDive to the engineering impact and governance decisions your organization needs to make.
A useful first sprint usually includes enough team and repository context to see real development patterns, while keeping the scope narrow enough for a clear readout and an actionable next step.
The first conversation usually covers measurement scope, engineering impact questions, privacy boundaries, and enterprise review.
AI usage, workflow patterns, code impact, review signals, and team practice across the scope selected during onboarding.
The sprint covers scope, onboarding, measurement, analysis, and recommendations for what to coach, standardize, govern, or roll out next.
DiffDive uses team-level visibility by default, protects developer privacy throughout, and focuses insight on improving engineering practice.